23 cans compared
Feline Natural vs Rawz
The typical Feline Natural can gets 0% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 9.3% for Rawz. Feline Natural has 9 of 9 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Rawz has 11 of 14. Below, every number is worked out the same way from each can’s label.
Feline Natural vs Rawz at a glance
Typical values are the middle recipe of each brand. Shares are of calories, so textures compare fairly. Marked cells show the better value where the gap is meaningful.
| Feline Natural | Rawz | |
|---|---|---|
| Cans we compare | 9 | 14 |
| Typical carbs, % of calories | 0% | 9.3% |
| Carb range | 0–0% | 1.7–14.3% |
| Recipes under 10% carbs | 9 of 9 | 11 of 14 |
| Typical protein, % of calories | 38% | 45% |
| Typical fat, % of calories | 62% | 49% |
| Calories per ounce | 30 | 26 |
| Calories per can | 79–172 | 110–188 |
| Recipes with published phosphorus | 9 of 9 | 14 of 14 |
| Typical phosphorus, mg per 100 kcal | 390 mg | 252 mg |
| Confirmed for kittens | 9 of 9 | 7 of 14 |
| Chicken-free recipes | 5 of 9 | 8 of 14 |
| Fish-free recipes | 2 of 9 | 6 of 14 |
| Textures | Meat in juices | Pâté, Shreds in broth |
Lowest-carb can from each brand
The recipe with the smallest share of calories from carbohydrate on each side, leaving out toppers meant for supplemental feeding.
Put these two side by sideChicken & Chicken Liver Pâté
- Carbs
- 1.7%
- Protein
- 33%
- Phosphorus
- 248mg
Which to choose, by what your cat needs
For a diabetic or overweight cat
Feline Natural is the lower-carb line overall. Its lowest-carb recipe is Beef & Hoki Feast at 0% of calories; Rawz’s is Chicken & Chicken Liver Pâté at 1.7%. Both brands have recipes under the 10% line (9 of 9 against 11 of 14), so the right recipe matters more than the brand.
For kidney concerns
Feline Natural publishes phosphorus for 9 of 9 recipes (typical 390 mg per 100 kcal). Rawz publishes phosphorus for 14 of 14 recipes (typical 252 mg per 100 kcal). Only recipes with a published value can be checked, so start from those and confirm targets with your vet.
For kittens
Feline Natural has 9 of 9 recipes whose label we could confirm covers growth or all life stages; Rawz has 7 of 14. A missing statement doesn’t mean a can is unsuitable, only that we couldn’t verify it.
For allergies and picky eaters
Chicken-free: Feline Natural 5 of 9, Rawz 8 of 14. Fish-free: Feline Natural 2 of 9, Rawz 6 of 14. Textures: Feline Natural makes meat in juices; Rawz makes pâté, shreds in broth.
Questions about Feline Natural vs Rawz
Is Feline Natural or Rawz lower in carbs?
The typical Feline Natural can gets 0% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 9.3% for Rawz. Feline Natural has 9 of 9 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Rawz has 11 of 14.
Which has more protein, Feline Natural or Rawz?
Feline Natural. Its typical can gets 38% of calories from protein, against 45% for Rawz. Feline Natural has 0 of 9 recipes over 50% protein calories; Rawz has 6 of 14.
Which is more filling per ounce?
Rawz. Its cans average 26 calories per ounce against 30 for Feline Natural, so a cat needs fewer ounces of it to get the same calories.
Do Feline Natural and Rawz publish phosphorus?
Feline Natural publishes phosphorus for 9 of 9 recipes (typical 390 mg per 100 kcal). Rawz publishes phosphorus for 14 of 14 recipes (typical 252 mg per 100 kcal).
Which is better for a diabetic cat, Feline Natural or Rawz?
Carbs are what matter most, and Feline Natural has the lower-carb line with 9 of 9 recipes under 10%. The best single choice is a specific recipe, not a brand: Beef & Hoki Feast (0%) from Feline Natural or Chicken & Chicken Liver Pâté (1.7%) from Rawz. Change a diabetic cat’s food only with your vet.