24 cans compared

Nulo vs Rawz

The typical Nulo can gets 5.1% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 9.3% for Rawz. Nulo has 10 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Rawz has 11 of 14. Below, every number is worked out the same way from each can’s label.

01

Nulo vs Rawz at a glance

Typical values are the middle recipe of each brand. Shares are of calories, so textures compare fairly. Marked cells show the better value where the gap is meaningful.

NuloRawz
Cans we compare1014
Typical carbs, % of calories5.1%9.3%
Carb range2.3–8.5%1.7–14.3%
Recipes under 10% carbs10 of 1011 of 14
Typical protein, % of calories40%45%
Typical fat, % of calories55%49%
Calories per ounce3426
Calories per can76–197110–188
Recipes with published phosphorus0 of 1014 of 14
Typical phosphorus, mg per 100 kcal—252 mg
Confirmed for kittens10 of 107 of 14
Chicken-free recipes3 of 108 of 14
Fish-free recipes1 of 106 of 14
TexturesPâté, Shreds in brothPâté, Shreds in broth
02

Lowest-carb can from each brand

The recipe with the smallest share of calories from carbohydrate on each side, leaving out toppers meant for supplemental feeding.

Put these two side by side
03

Same texture, head to head

For each texture both brands make, the lowest-carb recipe from each.

TextureNuloRawz
PâtéPaté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe2.3% carbs · 54% protein · 89 kcalChicken & Chicken Liver Pâté1.7% carbs · 33% protein · 188 kcal
Shreds in brothShredded Chicken & Duck Recipe in Gravy5.1% carbs · 51% protein · 76 kcalShredded Chicken9.3% carbs · 68% protein · 116 kcal
04

Which to choose, by what your cat needs

For a diabetic or overweight cat

Nulo is the lower-carb line overall. Its lowest-carb recipe is Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe at 2.3% of calories; Rawz’s is Chicken & Chicken Liver Pâté at 1.7%. Both brands have recipes under the 10% line (10 of 10 against 11 of 14), so the right recipe matters more than the brand.

For kidney concerns

Nulo doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Rawz publishes phosphorus for 14 of 14 recipes (typical 252 mg per 100 kcal). Only recipes with a published value can be checked, so start from those and confirm targets with your vet.

For kittens

Nulo has 10 of 10 recipes whose label we could confirm covers growth or all life stages; Rawz has 7 of 14. A missing statement doesn’t mean a can is unsuitable, only that we couldn’t verify it.

For allergies and picky eaters

Chicken-free: Nulo 3 of 10, Rawz 8 of 14. Fish-free: Nulo 1 of 10, Rawz 6 of 14. Textures: Nulo makes pâté, shreds in broth; Rawz makes pâté, shreds in broth.

05

Questions about Nulo vs Rawz

Is Nulo or Rawz lower in carbs?

The typical Nulo can gets 5.1% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 9.3% for Rawz. Nulo has 10 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Rawz has 11 of 14.

Which has more protein, Nulo or Rawz?

Nulo. Its typical can gets 40% of calories from protein, against 45% for Rawz. Nulo has 3 of 10 recipes over 50% protein calories; Rawz has 6 of 14.

Which is more filling per ounce?

Rawz. Its cans average 26 calories per ounce against 34 for Nulo, so a cat needs fewer ounces of it to get the same calories.

Do Nulo and Rawz publish phosphorus?

Nulo doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Rawz publishes phosphorus for 14 of 14 recipes (typical 252 mg per 100 kcal).

Which is better for a diabetic cat, Nulo or Rawz?

Carbs are what matter most, and Nulo has the lower-carb line with 10 of 10 recipes under 10%. The best single choice is a specific recipe, not a brand: Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe (2.3%) from Nulo or Chicken & Chicken Liver Pâté (1.7%) from Rawz. Change a diabetic cat’s food only with your vet.

06

Other comparisons with Nulo or Rawz