Fish & Shrimp Feast
- Carbs
- 2.5%
- Protein
- 74%
- Phosphorus
- not listed
20 cans compared
The typical Nulo can gets 5.1% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 12.5% for Fancy Feast. Fancy Feast has 5 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Nulo has 10 of 10. Below, every number is worked out the same way from each can’s label.
Typical values are the middle recipe of each brand. Shares are of calories, so textures compare fairly. Marked cells show the better value where the gap is meaningful.
| Fancy Feast | Nulo | |
|---|---|---|
| Cans we compare | 10 | 10 |
| Typical carbs, % of calories | 12.5% | 5.1% |
| Carb range | 2.5–18.4% | 2.3–8.5% |
| Recipes under 10% carbs | 5 of 10 | 10 of 10 |
| Typical protein, % of calories | 55% | 40% |
| Typical fat, % of calories | 30% | 55% |
| Calories per ounce | 29 | 34 |
| Calories per can | 65–98 | 76–197 |
| Recipes with published phosphorus | 0 of 10 | 0 of 10 |
| Typical phosphorus, mg per 100 kcal | — | — |
| Confirmed for kittens | 6 of 10 | 10 of 10 |
| Chicken-free recipes | 1 of 10 | 3 of 10 |
| Fish-free recipes | 2 of 10 | 1 of 10 |
| Textures | Flaked, Pâté, Chunks in gravy | Pâté, Shreds in broth |
The recipe with the smallest share of calories from carbohydrate on each side, leaving out toppers meant for supplemental feeding.
Put these two side by sideFor each texture both brands make, the lowest-carb recipe from each.
| Texture | Fancy Feast | Nulo |
|---|---|---|
| Pâté | Tender Beef & Chicken Feast3.8% carbs · 40% protein · 97 kcal | Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe2.3% carbs · 54% protein · 89 kcal |
Nulo is the lower-carb line overall. Its lowest-carb recipe is Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe at 2.3% of calories; Fancy Feast’s is Fish & Shrimp Feast at 2.5%. Both brands have recipes under the 10% line (10 of 10 against 5 of 10), so the right recipe matters more than the brand.
Fancy Feast doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Nulo doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Without published values neither brand can be checked for phosphorus from the label alone; ask the maker for a typical analysis.
Fancy Feast has 6 of 10 recipes whose label we could confirm covers growth or all life stages; Nulo has 10 of 10. A missing statement doesn’t mean a can is unsuitable, only that we couldn’t verify it.
Chicken-free: Fancy Feast 1 of 10, Nulo 3 of 10. Fish-free: Fancy Feast 2 of 10, Nulo 1 of 10. Textures: Fancy Feast makes flaked, pâté, chunks in gravy; Nulo makes pâté, shreds in broth.
The typical Nulo can gets 5.1% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 12.5% for Fancy Feast. Fancy Feast has 5 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Nulo has 10 of 10.
Nulo. Its typical can gets 40% of calories from protein, against 55% for Fancy Feast. Fancy Feast has 6 of 10 recipes over 50% protein calories; Nulo has 3 of 10.
Fancy Feast. Its cans average 29 calories per ounce against 34 for Nulo, so a cat needs fewer ounces of it to get the same calories.
Fancy Feast doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Nulo doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked.
Carbs are what matter most, and Nulo has the lower-carb line with 10 of 10 recipes under 10%. The best single choice is a specific recipe, not a brand: Fish & Shrimp Feast (2.5%) from Fancy Feast or Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe (2.3%) from Nulo. Change a diabetic cat’s food only with your vet.