Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe
- Carbs
- 2.3%
- Protein
- 54%
- Phosphorus
- not listed
18 cans compared
The typical Nulo can gets 5.1% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 6.9% for Purina Pro Plan. Nulo has 10 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Purina Pro Plan has 5 of 8. Below, every number is worked out the same way from each can’s label.
Typical values are the middle recipe of each brand. Shares are of calories, so textures compare fairly. Marked cells show the better value where the gap is meaningful.
| Nulo | Purina Pro Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Cans we compare | 10 | 8 |
| Typical carbs, % of calories | 5.1% | 6.9% |
| Carb range | 2.3–8.5% | 1.8–19.1% |
| Recipes under 10% carbs | 10 of 10 | 5 of 8 |
| Typical protein, % of calories | 40% | 50% |
| Typical fat, % of calories | 55% | 43% |
| Calories per ounce | 34 | 30 |
| Calories per can | 76–197 | 72–113 |
| Recipes with published phosphorus | 0 of 10 | 0 of 8 |
| Typical phosphorus, mg per 100 kcal | — | — |
| Confirmed for kittens | 10 of 10 | 2 of 8 |
| Chicken-free recipes | 3 of 10 | 0 of 8 |
| Fish-free recipes | 1 of 10 | 2 of 8 |
| Textures | Pâté, Shreds in broth | Pâté, Flaked, Chunks in gravy |
The recipe with the smallest share of calories from carbohydrate on each side, leaving out toppers meant for supplemental feeding.
Put these two side by sideFor each texture both brands make, the lowest-carb recipe from each.
| Texture | Nulo | Purina Pro Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Pâté | Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe2.3% carbs · 54% protein · 89 kcal | Chicken & Liver Entrée (Classic)1.8% carbs · 44% protein · 99 kcal |
Nulo is the lower-carb line overall. Its lowest-carb recipe is Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe at 2.3% of calories; Purina Pro Plan’s is Chicken & Liver Entrée (Classic) at 1.8%. Both brands have recipes under the 10% line (10 of 10 against 5 of 8), so the right recipe matters more than the brand.
Nulo doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Purina Pro Plan doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Without published values neither brand can be checked for phosphorus from the label alone; ask the maker for a typical analysis.
Nulo has 10 of 10 recipes whose label we could confirm covers growth or all life stages; Purina Pro Plan has 2 of 8. A missing statement doesn’t mean a can is unsuitable, only that we couldn’t verify it.
Chicken-free: Nulo 3 of 10, Purina Pro Plan 0 of 8. Fish-free: Nulo 1 of 10, Purina Pro Plan 2 of 8. Textures: Nulo makes pâté, shreds in broth; Purina Pro Plan makes pâté, flaked, chunks in gravy.
The typical Nulo can gets 5.1% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 6.9% for Purina Pro Plan. Nulo has 10 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Purina Pro Plan has 5 of 8.
Nulo. Its typical can gets 40% of calories from protein, against 50% for Purina Pro Plan. Nulo has 3 of 10 recipes over 50% protein calories; Purina Pro Plan has 4 of 8.
Purina Pro Plan. Its cans average 30 calories per ounce against 34 for Nulo, so a cat needs fewer ounces of it to get the same calories.
Nulo doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Purina Pro Plan doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked.
Carbs are what matter most, and Nulo has the lower-carb line with 10 of 10 recipes under 10%. The best single choice is a specific recipe, not a brand: Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe (2.3%) from Nulo or Chicken & Liver Entrée (Classic) (1.8%) from Purina Pro Plan. Change a diabetic cat’s food only with your vet.