Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe
- Carbs
- 2.3%
- Protein
- 54%
- Phosphorus
- not listed
Typical values are the middle recipe of each brand. Shares are of calories, so textures compare fairly. Marked cells show the better value where the gap is meaningful.
| Nulo | Weruva | |
|---|---|---|
| Cans we compare | 10 | 10 |
| Typical carbs, % of calories | 5.1% | 5.8% |
| Carb range | 2.3–8.5% | 0–12.4% |
| Recipes under 10% carbs | 10 of 10 | 7 of 10 |
| Typical protein, % of calories | 40% | 66% |
| Typical fat, % of calories | 55% | 24% |
| Calories per ounce | 34 | 20 |
| Calories per can | 76–197 | 51–78 |
| Recipes with published phosphorus | 0 of 10 | 6 of 10 |
| Typical phosphorus, mg per 100 kcal | — | 284 mg |
| Confirmed for kittens | 10 of 10 | 0 of 10 |
| Chicken-free recipes | 3 of 10 | 5 of 10 |
| Fish-free recipes | 1 of 10 | 4 of 10 |
| Textures | Pâté, Shreds in broth | Flaked, Chunks in gravy, Shreds in broth, Pâté |
The recipe with the smallest share of calories from carbohydrate on each side, leaving out toppers meant for supplemental feeding.
Put these two side by sideFor each texture both brands make, the lowest-carb recipe from each.
| Texture | Nulo | Weruva |
|---|---|---|
| Pâté | Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe2.3% carbs · 54% protein · 89 kcal | Press Your Lunch! (Chicken Dinner in a Hydrating Puree)3.7% carbs · 60% protein · 56 kcal |
| Shreds in broth | Shredded Chicken & Duck Recipe in Gravy5.1% carbs · 51% protein · 76 kcal | Chicken Frick 'A Zee3% carbs · 60% protein · 75 kcal |
Neither brand has a clear edge on carbs. Pick by recipe: Nulo’s lowest is Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe (2.3%), Weruva’s is Mideast Feast (0%).
Nulo doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Weruva publishes phosphorus for 6 of 10 recipes (typical 284 mg per 100 kcal). Only recipes with a published value can be checked, so start from those and confirm targets with your vet.
Nulo has 10 of 10 recipes whose label we could confirm covers growth or all life stages; Weruva has 0 of 10. A missing statement doesn’t mean a can is unsuitable, only that we couldn’t verify it.
Chicken-free: Nulo 3 of 10, Weruva 5 of 10. Fish-free: Nulo 1 of 10, Weruva 4 of 10. Textures: Nulo makes pâté, shreds in broth; Weruva makes flaked, chunks in gravy, shreds in broth, pâté.
Both brands land close on carbs: 5.1% of calories for the typical Nulo can and 5.8% for Weruva. Nulo has 10 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Weruva has 7 of 10.
Nulo. Its typical can gets 40% of calories from protein, against 66% for Weruva. Nulo has 3 of 10 recipes over 50% protein calories; Weruva has 10 of 10.
Weruva. Its cans average 20 calories per ounce against 34 for Nulo, so a cat needs fewer ounces of it to get the same calories.
Nulo doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Weruva publishes phosphorus for 6 of 10 recipes (typical 284 mg per 100 kcal).
Carbs are what matter most, and the two brands are close. The best single choice is a specific recipe, not a brand: Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe (2.3%) from Nulo or Mideast Feast (0%) from Weruva. Change a diabetic cat’s food only with your vet.