Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe
- Carbs
- 2.3%
- Protein
- 54%
- Phosphorus
- not listed
Typical values are the middle recipe of each brand. Shares are of calories, so textures compare fairly. Marked cells show the better value where the gap is meaningful.
| Nulo | Tiki Cat | |
|---|---|---|
| Cans we compare | 10 | 10 |
| Typical carbs, % of calories | 5.1% | 0% |
| Carb range | 2.3–8.5% | 0–4.6% |
| Recipes under 10% carbs | 10 of 10 | 10 of 10 |
| Typical protein, % of calories | 40% | 69% |
| Typical fat, % of calories | 55% | 31% |
| Calories per ounce | 34 | 25 |
| Calories per can | 76–197 | 59–77 |
| Recipes with published phosphorus | 0 of 10 | 0 of 10 |
| Typical phosphorus, mg per 100 kcal | — | — |
| Confirmed for kittens | 10 of 10 | 7 of 10 |
| Chicken-free recipes | 3 of 10 | 4 of 10 |
| Fish-free recipes | 1 of 10 | 4 of 10 |
| Textures | Pâté, Shreds in broth | Shreds in broth, Flaked, Chunks in gravy, Pâté |
The recipe with the smallest share of calories from carbohydrate on each side, leaving out toppers meant for supplemental feeding.
Put these two side by sideFor each texture both brands make, the lowest-carb recipe from each.
| Texture | Nulo | Tiki Cat |
|---|---|---|
| Pâté | Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe2.3% carbs · 54% protein · 89 kcal | Pate+ Chicken Recipe in Chicken Broth0% carbs · 69% protein · 72 kcal |
| Shreds in broth | Shredded Chicken & Duck Recipe in Gravy5.1% carbs · 51% protein · 76 kcal | Chicken Recipe in Broth0% carbs · 69% protein · 66 kcal |
Tiki Cat is the lower-carb line overall. Its lowest-carb recipe is Chicken Recipe in Broth at 0% of calories; Nulo’s is Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe at 2.3%. Both brands have recipes under the 10% line (10 of 10 against 10 of 10), so the right recipe matters more than the brand.
Nulo doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Tiki Cat doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Without published values neither brand can be checked for phosphorus from the label alone; ask the maker for a typical analysis.
Nulo has 10 of 10 recipes whose label we could confirm covers growth or all life stages; Tiki Cat has 7 of 10. A missing statement doesn’t mean a can is unsuitable, only that we couldn’t verify it.
Chicken-free: Nulo 3 of 10, Tiki Cat 4 of 10. Fish-free: Nulo 1 of 10, Tiki Cat 4 of 10. Textures: Nulo makes pâté, shreds in broth; Tiki Cat makes shreds in broth, flaked, chunks in gravy, pâté.
The typical Tiki Cat can gets 0% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 5.1% for Nulo. Nulo has 10 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Tiki Cat has 10 of 10.
Nulo. Its typical can gets 40% of calories from protein, against 69% for Tiki Cat. Nulo has 3 of 10 recipes over 50% protein calories; Tiki Cat has 10 of 10.
Tiki Cat. Its cans average 25 calories per ounce against 34 for Nulo, so a cat needs fewer ounces of it to get the same calories.
Nulo doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Tiki Cat doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked.
Carbs are what matter most, and Tiki Cat has the lower-carb line with 10 of 10 recipes under 10%. The best single choice is a specific recipe, not a brand: Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe (2.3%) from Nulo or Chicken Recipe in Broth (0%) from Tiki Cat. Change a diabetic cat’s food only with your vet.