Prime Filets With Ocean Whitefish & Tuna in Sauce
- Carbs
- 12.9%
- Protein
- 59%
- Phosphorus
- not listed
Typical values are the middle recipe of each brand. Shares are of calories, so textures compare fairly. Marked cells show the better value where the gap is meaningful.
| Friskies | Nulo | |
|---|---|---|
| Cans we compare | 10 | 10 |
| Typical carbs, % of calories | 16.3% | 5.1% |
| Carb range | 12.9–19.4% | 2.3–8.5% |
| Recipes under 10% carbs | 0 of 10 | 10 of 10 |
| Typical protein, % of calories | 50% | 40% |
| Typical fat, % of calories | 34% | 55% |
| Calories per ounce | 24 | 34 |
| Calories per can | 124–180 | 76–197 |
| Recipes with published phosphorus | 0 of 10 | 0 of 10 |
| Typical phosphorus, mg per 100 kcal | — | — |
| Confirmed for kittens | 0 of 10 | 10 of 10 |
| Chicken-free recipes | 0 of 10 | 3 of 10 |
| Fish-free recipes | 2 of 10 | 1 of 10 |
| Textures | Chunks in gravy, Pâté, Shreds in broth | Pâté, Shreds in broth |
The recipe with the smallest share of calories from carbohydrate on each side, leaving out toppers meant for supplemental feeding.
Put these two side by sideFor each texture both brands make, the lowest-carb recipe from each.
| Texture | Friskies | Nulo |
|---|---|---|
| Pâté | Salmon Dinner14.9% carbs · 36% protein · 178 kcal | Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe2.3% carbs · 54% protein · 89 kcal |
| Shreds in broth | Chicken & Salmon Dinner in Gravy16.6% carbs · 50% protein · 130 kcal | Shredded Chicken & Duck Recipe in Gravy5.1% carbs · 51% protein · 76 kcal |
Nulo is the lower-carb line overall. Its lowest-carb recipe is Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe at 2.3% of calories; Friskies’ is Prime Filets With Ocean Whitefish & Tuna in Sauce at 12.9%. Friskies has no recipes under the 10% line we compare, so for a diabetic cat Nulo gives you 10 to choose from and Friskies none.
Friskies doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Nulo doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Without published values neither brand can be checked for phosphorus from the label alone; ask the maker for a typical analysis.
Friskies has 0 of 10 recipes whose label we could confirm covers growth or all life stages; Nulo has 10 of 10. A missing statement doesn’t mean a can is unsuitable, only that we couldn’t verify it.
Chicken-free: Friskies 0 of 10, Nulo 3 of 10. Fish-free: Friskies 2 of 10, Nulo 1 of 10. Textures: Friskies makes chunks in gravy, pâté, shreds in broth; Nulo makes pâté, shreds in broth.
The typical Nulo can gets 5.1% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 16.3% for Friskies. Friskies has 0 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Nulo has 10 of 10.
Nulo. Its typical can gets 40% of calories from protein, against 50% for Friskies. Friskies has 2 of 10 recipes over 50% protein calories; Nulo has 3 of 10.
Friskies. Its cans average 24 calories per ounce against 34 for Nulo, so a cat needs fewer ounces of it to get the same calories.
Friskies doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Nulo doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked.
Carbs are what matter most, and Nulo has the lower-carb line with 10 of 10 recipes under 10%. The best single choice is a specific recipe, not a brand: Prime Filets With Ocean Whitefish & Tuna in Sauce (12.9%) from Friskies or Paté Yellowfin Tuna & Shrimp Recipe (2.3%) from Nulo. Change a diabetic cat’s food only with your vet.