Chicken & Liver Entrée (Classic)
- Carbs
- 1.8%
- Protein
- 44%
- Phosphorus
- not listed
18 cans compared
The typical Purina Pro Plan can gets 6.9% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 14.6% for Royal Canin. Purina Pro Plan has 5 of 8 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Royal Canin has 2 of 10. Below, every number is worked out the same way from each can’s label.
Typical values are the middle recipe of each brand. Shares are of calories, so textures compare fairly. Marked cells show the better value where the gap is meaningful.
| Purina Pro Plan | Royal Canin | |
|---|---|---|
| Cans we compare | 8 | 10 |
| Typical carbs, % of calories | 6.9% | 14.6% |
| Carb range | 1.8–19.1% | 8.8–24.1% |
| Recipes under 10% carbs | 5 of 8 | 2 of 10 |
| Typical protein, % of calories | 50% | 53% |
| Typical fat, % of calories | 43% | 29% |
| Calories per ounce | 30 | 22 |
| Calories per can | 72–113 | 55–78 |
| Recipes with published phosphorus | 0 of 8 | 0 of 10 |
| Typical phosphorus, mg per 100 kcal | — | — |
| Confirmed for kittens | 2 of 8 | 2 of 10 |
| Chicken-free recipes | 0 of 8 | 0 of 10 |
| Fish-free recipes | 2 of 8 | 2 of 10 |
| Textures | Pâté, Flaked, Chunks in gravy | Pâté, Chunks in gravy |
The recipe with the smallest share of calories from carbohydrate on each side, leaving out toppers meant for supplemental feeding.
Put these two side by sideFor each texture both brands make, the lowest-carb recipe from each.
| Texture | Purina Pro Plan | Royal Canin |
|---|---|---|
| Pâté | Chicken & Liver Entrée (Classic)1.8% carbs · 44% protein · 99 kcal | Kitten Loaf in Sauce8.8% carbs · 53% protein · 78 kcal |
| Chunks in gravy | Chicken & Rice Entrée in Gravy15% carbs · 59% protein · 72 kcal | Adult Instinctive Thin Slices in Gravy10.6% carbs · 62% protein · 66 kcal |
Purina Pro Plan is the lower-carb line overall. Its lowest-carb recipe is Chicken & Liver Entrée (Classic) at 1.8% of calories; Royal Canin’s is Kitten Loaf in Sauce at 8.8%. Both brands have recipes under the 10% line (5 of 8 against 2 of 10), so the right recipe matters more than the brand.
Purina Pro Plan doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Royal Canin doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Without published values neither brand can be checked for phosphorus from the label alone; ask the maker for a typical analysis.
Purina Pro Plan has 2 of 8 recipes whose label we could confirm covers growth or all life stages; Royal Canin has 2 of 10. A missing statement doesn’t mean a can is unsuitable, only that we couldn’t verify it.
Chicken-free: Purina Pro Plan 0 of 8, Royal Canin 0 of 10. Fish-free: Purina Pro Plan 2 of 8, Royal Canin 2 of 10. Textures: Purina Pro Plan makes pâté, flaked, chunks in gravy; Royal Canin makes pâté, chunks in gravy.
The typical Purina Pro Plan can gets 6.9% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 14.6% for Royal Canin. Purina Pro Plan has 5 of 8 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Royal Canin has 2 of 10.
Purina Pro Plan. Its typical can gets 50% of calories from protein, against 53% for Royal Canin. Purina Pro Plan has 4 of 8 recipes over 50% protein calories; Royal Canin has 8 of 10.
Royal Canin. Its cans average 22 calories per ounce against 30 for Purina Pro Plan, so a cat needs fewer ounces of it to get the same calories.
Purina Pro Plan doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Royal Canin doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked.
Carbs are what matter most, and Purina Pro Plan has the lower-carb line with 5 of 8 recipes under 10%. The best single choice is a specific recipe, not a brand: Chicken & Liver Entrée (Classic) (1.8%) from Purina Pro Plan or Kitten Loaf in Sauce (8.8%) from Royal Canin. Change a diabetic cat’s food only with your vet.