Prime Filets With Ocean Whitefish & Tuna in Sauce
- Carbs
- 12.9%
- Protein
- 59%
- Phosphorus
- not listed
20 cans compared
The typical Royal Canin can gets 14.6% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 16.3% for Friskies. Friskies has 0 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Royal Canin has 2 of 10. Below, every number is worked out the same way from each can’s label.
Typical values are the middle recipe of each brand. Shares are of calories, so textures compare fairly. Marked cells show the better value where the gap is meaningful.
| Friskies | Royal Canin | |
|---|---|---|
| Cans we compare | 10 | 10 |
| Typical carbs, % of calories | 16.3% | 14.6% |
| Carb range | 12.9–19.4% | 8.8–24.1% |
| Recipes under 10% carbs | 0 of 10 | 2 of 10 |
| Typical protein, % of calories | 50% | 53% |
| Typical fat, % of calories | 34% | 29% |
| Calories per ounce | 24 | 22 |
| Calories per can | 124–180 | 55–78 |
| Recipes with published phosphorus | 0 of 10 | 0 of 10 |
| Typical phosphorus, mg per 100 kcal | — | — |
| Confirmed for kittens | 0 of 10 | 2 of 10 |
| Chicken-free recipes | 0 of 10 | 0 of 10 |
| Fish-free recipes | 2 of 10 | 2 of 10 |
| Textures | Chunks in gravy, Pâté, Shreds in broth | Pâté, Chunks in gravy |
The recipe with the smallest share of calories from carbohydrate on each side, leaving out toppers meant for supplemental feeding.
Put these two side by sideFor each texture both brands make, the lowest-carb recipe from each.
| Texture | Friskies | Royal Canin |
|---|---|---|
| Chunks in gravy | Prime Filets With Ocean Whitefish & Tuna in Sauce12.9% carbs · 59% protein · 124 kcal | Adult Instinctive Thin Slices in Gravy10.6% carbs · 62% protein · 66 kcal |
| Pâté | Salmon Dinner14.9% carbs · 36% protein · 178 kcal | Kitten Loaf in Sauce8.8% carbs · 53% protein · 78 kcal |
Royal Canin is the lower-carb line overall. Its lowest-carb recipe is Kitten Loaf in Sauce at 8.8% of calories; Friskies’ is Prime Filets With Ocean Whitefish & Tuna in Sauce at 12.9%. Friskies has no recipes under the 10% line we compare, so for a diabetic cat Royal Canin gives you 2 to choose from and Friskies none.
Friskies doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Royal Canin doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Without published values neither brand can be checked for phosphorus from the label alone; ask the maker for a typical analysis.
Friskies has 0 of 10 recipes whose label we could confirm covers growth or all life stages; Royal Canin has 2 of 10. A missing statement doesn’t mean a can is unsuitable, only that we couldn’t verify it.
Chicken-free: Friskies 0 of 10, Royal Canin 0 of 10. Fish-free: Friskies 2 of 10, Royal Canin 2 of 10. Textures: Friskies makes chunks in gravy, pâté, shreds in broth; Royal Canin makes pâté, chunks in gravy.
The typical Royal Canin can gets 14.6% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 16.3% for Friskies. Friskies has 0 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Royal Canin has 2 of 10.
Friskies. Its typical can gets 50% of calories from protein, against 53% for Royal Canin. Friskies has 2 of 10 recipes over 50% protein calories; Royal Canin has 8 of 10.
About the same: 24 calories per ounce for Friskies and 22 for Royal Canin.
Friskies doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Royal Canin doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked.
Carbs are what matter most, and Royal Canin has the lower-carb line with 2 of 10 recipes under 10%. The best single choice is a specific recipe, not a brand: Prime Filets With Ocean Whitefish & Tuna in Sauce (12.9%) from Friskies or Kitten Loaf in Sauce (8.8%) from Royal Canin. Change a diabetic cat’s food only with your vet.