Kitten Loaf in Sauce
- Carbs
- 8.8%
- Protein
- 53%
- Phosphorus
- not listed
20 cans compared
The typical Tiki Cat can gets 0% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 14.6% for Royal Canin. Royal Canin has 2 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Tiki Cat has 10 of 10. Below, every number is worked out the same way from each can’s label.
Typical values are the middle recipe of each brand. Shares are of calories, so textures compare fairly. Marked cells show the better value where the gap is meaningful.
| Royal Canin | Tiki Cat | |
|---|---|---|
| Cans we compare | 10 | 10 |
| Typical carbs, % of calories | 14.6% | 0% |
| Carb range | 8.8–24.1% | 0–4.6% |
| Recipes under 10% carbs | 2 of 10 | 10 of 10 |
| Typical protein, % of calories | 53% | 69% |
| Typical fat, % of calories | 29% | 31% |
| Calories per ounce | 22 | 25 |
| Calories per can | 55–78 | 59–77 |
| Recipes with published phosphorus | 0 of 10 | 0 of 10 |
| Typical phosphorus, mg per 100 kcal | — | — |
| Confirmed for kittens | 2 of 10 | 7 of 10 |
| Chicken-free recipes | 0 of 10 | 4 of 10 |
| Fish-free recipes | 2 of 10 | 4 of 10 |
| Textures | Pâté, Chunks in gravy | Shreds in broth, Flaked, Chunks in gravy, Pâté |
The recipe with the smallest share of calories from carbohydrate on each side, leaving out toppers meant for supplemental feeding.
Put these two side by sideFor each texture both brands make, the lowest-carb recipe from each.
| Texture | Royal Canin | Tiki Cat |
|---|---|---|
| Pâté | Kitten Loaf in Sauce8.8% carbs · 53% protein · 78 kcal | Pate+ Chicken Recipe in Chicken Broth0% carbs · 69% protein · 72 kcal |
| Chunks in gravy | Adult Instinctive Thin Slices in Gravy10.6% carbs · 62% protein · 66 kcal | Makaha Grill Mackerel & Sardines0% carbs · 69% protein · 59 kcal |
Tiki Cat is the lower-carb line overall. Its lowest-carb recipe is Chicken Recipe in Broth at 0% of calories; Royal Canin’s is Kitten Loaf in Sauce at 8.8%. Both brands have recipes under the 10% line (10 of 10 against 2 of 10), so the right recipe matters more than the brand.
Royal Canin doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Tiki Cat doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Without published values neither brand can be checked for phosphorus from the label alone; ask the maker for a typical analysis.
Royal Canin has 2 of 10 recipes whose label we could confirm covers growth or all life stages; Tiki Cat has 7 of 10. A missing statement doesn’t mean a can is unsuitable, only that we couldn’t verify it.
Chicken-free: Royal Canin 0 of 10, Tiki Cat 4 of 10. Fish-free: Royal Canin 2 of 10, Tiki Cat 4 of 10. Textures: Royal Canin makes pâté, chunks in gravy; Tiki Cat makes shreds in broth, flaked, chunks in gravy, pâté.
The typical Tiki Cat can gets 0% of its calories from carbohydrate, against 14.6% for Royal Canin. Royal Canin has 2 of 10 recipes under the 10% low-carb line; Tiki Cat has 10 of 10.
Royal Canin. Its typical can gets 53% of calories from protein, against 69% for Tiki Cat. Royal Canin has 8 of 10 recipes over 50% protein calories; Tiki Cat has 10 of 10.
Royal Canin. Its cans average 22 calories per ounce against 25 for Tiki Cat, so a cat needs fewer ounces of it to get the same calories.
Royal Canin doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked. Tiki Cat doesn’t publish phosphorus on the pages we checked.
Carbs are what matter most, and Tiki Cat has the lower-carb line with 10 of 10 recipes under 10%. The best single choice is a specific recipe, not a brand: Kitten Loaf in Sauce (8.8%) from Royal Canin or Chicken Recipe in Broth (0%) from Tiki Cat. Change a diabetic cat’s food only with your vet.